Friday, September 14, 2012

Chicago teachers vs. teaching?

The Economist notes on The teachers' strike in Chicago: Fighting irrelevance with fire that
The boffins at the Urban Education Institute (UEI) in Chicago have written an exemplary book on school improvement. They looked at 100 elementary schools that showed progress in attendance and test scores over a seven-year period, and 100 others that did not. They argue—with quantitative data—that five essential pillars are needed to build a great school. These are:
  • effective school leadership,
  • collaborative teachers (with committed staff and professional development),
  • parent-community ties,
  • a student-centered (and safe) learning climate with high expectations,
  • and ambitious and demanding instruction.
(Reformatted.) I'm always suspicious of lists like that, but it's plausible. In any case, like most of what I've read in the past few days, the point of the article is far from favorable towards the striking teachers; the author here believes that they not just demanding more money, but trying to prevent improvements in a failing school system. And this seems to be bipartisan, to a considerable extent: they're battling Rahm Emanuel, extremely prominent Democrat, while from the other side we hear Paul Ryan on Chicago Teachers’ Strike: ‘We Stand with Mayor Rahm Emanuel’ - ABC News
“I’ve known Rahm Emanuel for years. He’s a former colleague of mine. Rahm and I have not agreed on every issue or on a lot of issues, but Mayor Emanuel is right today in saying that this teacher’s union strike is unnecessary and wrong. We know that Rahm is not going to support our campaign, but on this issue and this day we stand with Mayor Rahm Emanuel.”
Emanuel and Ryan both like charters, too. So do I. And they both like external evaluation. I have mixed feelings about that. Should Teachers Be Graded On Standardized Tests?
if you think that teachers do make a difference, and that some of the teachers aren’t very good, it seems to me that you have two choices. Hold out for a decentralized, discretionary, local-knowledge based system which has no change of materializing for various legal and structural reasons. Or develop admittedly imperfect evaluations, and use them as a replacement metric for seniority and ed credentials. Naturally, the teachers will hate this, in part because some of the resulting decisions will in fact be unfair. But it might be the best we can do.
Well, in Chicago it might be the best they can do; I suspect that local small schools can eventually do better. Or then again, maybe not.
There was also a roundup of opposing views at Chicago Teacher Strike: A News and Opinion Roundup | Via Meadia.

No comments:

Post a Comment